THE HOLY SPIRIT, then HE SPOKE "JESUS WORDS." You NAZI SWINE try every

way to demean the BARE SNIFFIN' FACT... YOU OBEY, or BURN IN HELL>

GENISIS thru APOCALYPSE, OBEY or GO TO HELL. YOU CAN NOT SECOND GUESS

GOD- that is PRESUMPTOUS SIN. You WILL Go to HELL. Neither shall you

say: "The Church Dosen't Folloer them OLD TIME teachings..."WOMAN SHALL

KEEP SILENT..." etc. OBEY or BURN, Jezebel Whores! The ISLAMIC treats

their Womens better. IF THEY ARE NOT COVERED, they are SLUTTISH

WHORES-and THEY WILL TAKE YOU to HELL with thewm. Don't Not You Get Up

On Yer HIGH HORSE, smarty Beritches...DO IT GODS WAY, or you's a goin to

have HELL TO PAY! I ain't a FUNDEL-MENTIEL-ISTER. I AM A "WANTER TO BE

RIGHT WITH GOD" BIBLE BELIEVIER. It is aS it wrere, THE TRAFFICK LAWS.

Them there RED LITES meanings are "YOU STOP!" If YOU say "I DON'T NOT

BELIEVE" and RUNN RIGHTER THRU them RED LITES, yous a-going to be PULLED

DOWN by and TRAFFIK COPPER. He's NOT GOIM TO WANTER HEER no "I DON'T NOT

BEELIVE in THEM" escuser! GOD SAME EXACT WAY ALSO TOO!@ Only GOD PUTT

YOU SOUL IN TO A LAKE a FIRE!!! FOREVER!!! Yes! GET OVER IT! You MODERN

DEUCATIONS are TURNINGS of CHILDRENS & FEEMAILS of the WOMENS SPECIES

into SINN-SUCKING-SLUTS and LITTLE HELL CAUSAUL DAMNER MACHINES! Alser

too the TELE-VILE-SIN box...TV...IN APOCALYPSE of a the GREAT St JOHN

the REVELATOR ch. 13+14 THEM TV=666=DOOM=666=IMAGE OF THE BEAST!" and

REV.14. 22 SEZ ALL WHO WARTCHERS of TELE-VILE-SIN (TV) 666=DOOM=666 GOIN

TO BURN IN HELL forever! GET over you MODERN SMART ALEX KNOWN IT ALL

STUOPIDS! God ain't SUBJECT to WHAT YOU WANT! Its HIS WAY or HELL TO

PAY! Huh? WHAT PART of BIBLE you have PROBLEMS with? LEARN TO LIVE WITH

BIBLE=GODS LAWS> You WILL SARTINLEY BE SORRY if you Dont. not! Yous all

DAMN FOOLS, & GODS goin to MAKE YOUS WISHT THAT YOUINS HADN'T NOT NEVER

EVER BEENED BORNED ED when he LOOKES YOUS STREAIT INNA EYE & TELLS

YOUINSIS "THINK YOUS REAALLY SMARTS? HAW! GOINGS TO HELL, SAmart

Feller!" NO FART SMELLERS in HEAVEN! re: Jesus called them Sodomite

Queers (talk about revisionism) Reply to: see below Date: 2009-05-09,

10:26AM PDT Rather than replying to the posters assertion about what

Jesus said about homosexuals, you quote Paul. Either you are

deliberately misleading readers or you're ignorant of your Bible. At

this point, so many Fundamentalists have misled and lied, it is a

natural assumption that you are purposely misleading, though it would be

less sad if you were merely ignorant. Jesus did speak about Sodom in

the sermon on the Mount, but he himself discribed the sins of Sodom as

inhospitality to strangers/out of towners, a disregard for the homeless

and hungry, not caring for the destitute and the marginalized. Now,

taking good Christians into account here, let's say Carrie Prejean, we

see that she directed money into obtaining plastic to enhance her

breasts (which is like mixing two different materials/cloths of two

different ilks--Leviticus), rather than using that money to care for the

poor, the hungry, the homeless (rather like the millions of dollars

deflected from the truly needy and to some man-made legislation that

really doesn't much matter to God, who would prefer to see his children

fed and shelter, than discriminated against). By bringing Corinthians

and Romans into the discussion, and being a literalist (misguided as you

may be), you must also then condemn folks who are

hauty/prideful/boastful/unmerciful (and there is no group among

Americans today who are more so than Fundamentalist Christians, who are

very boastful, very prideful, and very stingy with their mercy). Also

condemned are those who are disobedient to their parents, deceitful (you

were a bit deceitful in your answer, so you may too be condemned),

slanders/full of strife/heartless (it isn't looking too good for you)!

By the way, Paul, in writing about the passions of the flesh, clearly

writes about passions out of control, excess. He refers to heterosexuals

who leave their natural relations, he speaks of ritual sexual acts,

prostitution and pederasty. Also, the concept of nature at that time,

was not the way we see nature today. There was no such concept then,

because society hadn't yet defined it, nor had much to measure nature

against. When Paul discusses nature and what is natural, he is speaking

about what is customary, what was characteristic. Now, you can take

Paul's point of view as he wrote it, and still use it as you do, but at

least you should be aware of exactly the way he uses the term "natural."

My suggestion is this for you (I'm certain you won't mind a suggestion,

since you give them out feely), if you are going to flog people with the

Bible, then you may wish to use it against all those who you believe

offend it as vehemently as you appear to do when using it against one

group. You will want to flog liars, adulterers (folks on their second

marriage), people who are disobedient to their parents, people who are

prideful.....you should be an equal opportunity hater, for that is what

the Bible would wish you to be, and you may wish by flogging yourself

first. When you have completely pummelled the heartless pride in your

own heart, the boastful nature you exhibited here out of your system,

then you may have the extra time to beat up all the other sinners in

this world, and you have a whole lot to choose from. "The Christian

myths were first related of Horus or Osiris, who was the embodiment of

divine goodness, wisdom, truth and purity...This was the greatest hero

that ever lived in the mind of man -- not in the flesh -- the only hero

to whom the miracles were natural because he was not human." Gerald

Massey, author of "The Natural Genesis," 1 Comparison of some life

events of Horus and Jesus: Event Horus Yeshua of Nazareth, a.k.a. Jesus

Conception: By a virgin. There is some doubt about this matter By a

virgin. 3 Father: Only begotten son of the God Osiris. Only begotten son

of Yehovah (in the form of the Holy Spirit). Mother: Isis-Meri. 4 Miriam

(now often referred to as Mary). Foster father: Seb, (a.k.a. Jo-Seph). 4

Joseph. Foster father's ancestry: Of royal descent. Of royal descent.

Birth location: In a cave. In a cave or stable. Annunciation: By an

angel to Isis, his mother. By an angel to Miriam, his mother. 3 Birth

heralded by: The star Sirius, the morning star. An unidentified "star in

the East." Birth date: Ancient Egyptians paraded a manger and child

representing Horus through the streets at the time of the winter

solstice (about DEC-21). In reality, he had no birth date; he was not a

human. Born during the fall. However, his birth date is now celebrated

on DEC-25. The date was chosen to occur on the same date as the birth of

Mithra, Dionysus and the Sol Invictus (unconquerable Sun), etc. Birth

announcement: By angels. By angels. 3 Birth witnesses: Shepherds.

Shepherds. 3 Later witnesses to birth: Three solar deities. An unknown

number of wise men. 3 They are said to have brought three gifts; thus

the legend grew that there were three men. Death threat during infancy:

Herut tried to have Horus murdered. Herod tried to have Jesus murdered.

Handling the threat: The God That tells Horus' mother "Come, thou

goddess Isis, hide thyself with thy child." An angel tells Jesus' father

to: "Arise and take the young child and his mother and flee into Egypt."

Rite of passage ritual: Horus came of age with a special ritual, when

his eye was restored. Taken by parents to the temple for what is today

called a bar mitzvah ritual. Age at the ritual: 12 12 Break in life

history: No data between ages of 12 & 30. No data between ages of 12 &

30. Baptism location: In the river Eridanus. In the river Jordan. Age at

baptism: 30. 30. Baptized by: Anup the Baptiser. John the Baptist,

a.k.a. John the Baptist. Subsequent fate of the baptiser: Beheaded.

Beheaded. Temptation: Taken from the desert of Amenta up a high mountain

by his arch-rival Sut. Sut (a.k.a. Set) was a precursor for the Hebrew

Satan. Taken from the desert in Palestine up a high mountain by his

arch-rival Satan. Result of temptation: Horus resists temptation. Jesus

resists temptation. Close followers: Twelve disciples. There is some

doubt about this matter as well. Twelve disciples. Activities: Walked on

water, cast out demons, healed the sick, restored sight to the blind. He

"stilled the sea by his power." Walked on water, cast out demons, healed

the sick, restored sight to the blind. He ordered the sea with a "Peace,

be still" command. Raising of the dead: Horus raised Osirus, his dead

father, from the grave. 5 Jesus raised Lazarus from the grave. Location

where the resurrection miracle occurred: Anu, an Egyptian city where the

rites of the death, burial and resurrection of Horus were enacted

annually. 5 Hebrews added their prefix for house ('beth") to "Anu" to

produce "Beth-Anu" or the "House of Anu." Since "u" and "y" were

interchangeable in antiquity, "Bethanu" became "Bethany," the location

mentioned in John 11. Linkage between the name of Osirus in Egyptian

religion and Lazarus in the Gospel of John: Asar was an alternative name

for Osirus, Horus' father. Horus raised Asar from the dead. He was

referred to as "the Asar," as a sign of respect. Translated into Hebrew,

Asr is "El-Asar." The Romans added the prefix "us" to indicate a male

name, producing "Elasarus." Over time, the "E" was dropped and "s"

became "z," producing "Lazarus." 5 Jesus is said to have raised his

friend Lazarus from the dead. Transfigured: On a mountain. On a high

mountain. Key address(es): Sermon on the Mount. Sermon on the Mount;

Sermon on the Plain. Method of death By crucifixion or by the sting of a

scorpion; sources differ. 6 By crucifixion. Accompanied by: Two thieves.

Two thieves. Burial In a tomb. In a tomb. Fate after death: Descended

into Hell; resurrected after three days. Descended into Hell;

resurrected after about 30 to 38 hours (Friday PM to presumably some

time in Sunday AM) covering parts of three days. Resurrection announced

by: Women. Women. Future: Reign for 1,000 years in the Millennium. Reign

for 1,000 years in the Millennium. Comparison of some characteristics

of Horus and Jesus: Characteristics Horus Yeshua of Nazareth, a.k.a.

Jesus Nature: Regarded as a mythical character. Regarded as a 1st

century CE human prophet by Jewish Christians; viewed as a human man-god

in the Gospel of John. Main role: Savior of humanity. Savior of

humanity. Status: God-man. God-man. Common portrayal: Virgin Isis

holding the infant Horus. Virgin Mary holding the infant Jesus. Title:

KRST, the anointed one. Christ, the anointed one. Other names: The good

shepherd, the lamb of God, the bread of life, the son of man, the Word,

the fisher, the winnower. The good shepherd, the lamb of God, the bread

of life, the son of man, the Word, the fisher, the winnower. Zodiac

sign: Associated with Pisces, the fish. Associated with Pisces, the

fish. Main symbols: Fish, beetle, the vine, shepherd's crook. Fish,

beetle, the vine, the shepherd's crook. did Jesus mention gays? HE

CALLED THEN SODOMITE QUEERS ( commit such things are worthy of death,)

How many times did Jesus mention gays duiring his sermon on the mount?

NONE How many times did Jesus mention gays at all? NONE For therein is

the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written,

The just shall live by faith. 001:018 For the wrath of God is revealed

from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold

the truth in unrighteousness; 001:019 Because that which may be known of

God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 001:020 For

the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly

seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal

power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 001:021 Because

that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were

thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart

was darkened. 001:022 Professing themselves to be wise, they became

fools, 001:023 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an

image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts,

and creeping things. 001:024 Wherefore God also gave them up to

uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their

own bodies between themselves: 001:025 Who changed the truth of God into

a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who

is blessed for ever. Amen. 001:026 For this cause God gave them up unto

vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into

that which is against nature: 001:027 And likewise also the men, leaving

the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another;

men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves

that recompence of their error which was meet. 001:028 And even as they

did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a

reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 001:029

Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness,

covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit,

malignity; whisperers, 001:030 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful,

proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

001:031 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural

affection, implacable, unmerciful: 001:032 Who knowing the judgment of

God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do

the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. 002:001 Therefore thou

art inexcusable, O man * Location: commit such things are worthy of

death, MY UNCLE the WRITER: Date: 2006-06-13, 8:58PM PDT by Edward

L. Bernays (originally published in 1928) The conscious and

intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the

masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who

manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible

government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are

governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested,

largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the

way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human

beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a

smoothly functioning society. Our invisible governors are, in many

cases, unaware of the identity of their fellow members in the inner

cabinet. They govern us by their qualities of natural leadership, their

ability to supply needed ideas and by their key position in the social

structure. Whatever attitude one chooses toward this condition, it

remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in

the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical

thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons-a

trifling fraction of our hundred and twenty million-who understand the

mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull

the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces

and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world. It is not usually

realized how necessary these invisible governors are to the orderly

functioning of our group life. In theory, every citizen may vote for

whom he pleases. Our Constitution does not envisage political parties as

part of the mechanism of government, and its framers seem not to have

pictured to themselves the existence in our national politics of

anything like the modern political machine. But the American voters soon

found that without organization and direction their individual votes,

cast, perhaps, for dozens of hundreds of candidates, would produce

nothing but confusion. Invisible government, in the shape of rudimentary

political parties, arose almost overnight. Ever since then we have

agreed, for the sake of simplicity and practicality, that party machines

should narrow down the field of choice to two candidates, or at most

three or four. In theory, every citizen makes up his mind on public

questions and matters of private conduct. In practice, if all men had to

study for themselves the abstruse economic, political, and ethical data

involved in every question, they would find it impossible to come to a

conclusion without anything. We have voluntarily agreed to let an

invisible government sift the data and high-spot the outstanding issue

so that our field of choice shall be narrowed to practical proportions.

From our leaders and the media they use to reach the public, we accept

the evidence and the demarcation of issues bearing upon public question;

from some ethical teacher, be it a minister, a favorite essayist, or

merely prevailing opinion, we accept a standardized code of social

conduct to which we conform most of the time. In theory, everybody buys

the best and cheapest commodities offered him on the market. In

practice, if every one went around pricing, and chemically tasting

before purchasing, the dozens of soaps or fabrics or brands of bread

which are for sale, economic life would be hopelessly jammed. To avoid

such confusion, society consents to have its choice narrowed to ideas

and objects brought to it attention through propaganda of all kinds.

There is consequently a vast and continuous effort going on to capture

our minds in the interest of some policy or commodity or idea. It might

be better to have, instead of propaganda and special pleading,

committees of wise men who would choose our rulers, dictate our conduct,

private and public, and decide upon the best types of clothes for us to

wear and the best kinds of food for us to eat. But we have chosen the

opposite method, that of open competition. We must find a way to make

free competition function with reasonable smoothness. To achieve this

society has consented to permit free competition to be organized by

leadership and propaganda. Who are the men, who, without our realizing

it, give us our ideas, tell us whom to admire and whom to despise, what

to believe about the ownership of public utilities .. about immigration

who tell us how our houses should be designed, what furniture we should

put into them, what menus we should serve at our table, what kind of

shirts we must wear, what sports we should indulge in, what plays we

should see, what charities we should support, what pictures we should

admire, what slang we should affect, what jokes we should laugh at? A

presidential candidate may be "drafted" in response to "around popular

demand," but it is well known that his name may be decided upon by half

a dozen men sitting L.. around a table in a hotel room. A man buying a

suit of clothe imagines that he is choosing, according to his taste and

his personality, the kind of garment which he prefers. In reality, he

may be obeying the orders of an anonymous gentleman tailor in London.

This personage is the silent partner in a modest tailoring

establishment, which is patronized by gentlemen of fashion and princes

of blood. He suggest to British noblemen and others a blue cloth instead

of gray, two buttons instead of three, or sleeves a quarter of an inch

narrower than last season. The distinguished customer approves of the

idea. But how does this fact affect John Smith of Topeka? The gentleman

tailor is under contract with a certain large American firm, which

manufactures men's suits, to send them instantly the designs of the

suits chosen by the leaders of London fashion. Upon receiving the

designs, with specifications as to color, weight, and texture, the firm

immediately places an order with the cloth makers for several hundred

thousand dollars' worth of cloth. The suits made up according to the

specifications are then advertised as the latest fashion. The

fashionable men in New York Chicago, Boston, and Philadelphia wear them.

And the Topeka man, recognizing this leadership, does the same. Women

are just as subject to the commands of invisible government as men. A

silk manufacturer, seeking a new market for its product, suggested to a

large manufacturer of shoes that women's shoes should be covered with

silk to match their dresses. The idea was adopted and systematically

propagandized. A popular actress was persuaded to wear the shoes. The

fashion spread. The shoe firm was ready with the supply to meet thee

created demand. And the silk company was ready with the silk for more

shoes. The new profession of public relations has grown up because of

the increasing complexity of modern life and the consequent necessity

for making the actions of one part of the public understandable to other

sectors of the public. It is due, too, to the increasing dependence of

organized power of all sorts upon public opinion. Governments, whether

they are monarchical, constitutional, democratic or communist, depend

upon acquiescent public opinion for the success of their efforts and, in

fact, government is government only by virtue of public acquiescence.

Industries, public utilities, educational movements, indeed all groups

representing any concept or product, whether they are majority or

minority ideas, succeed only because of approving public opinion. Public

opinion is the unacknowledged partner in all broad efforts. The public

relations counsel, then, is the agent who, working with modern media of

communications and the group formations of society, brings an idea to

the consciousness of the public. The systematic study of mass

psychology revealed t7 students the potentialities of invisible

government of society by manipulation of the motives which actuate man

in the group. Trotter and Le Bon, who approached the subject in a

scientific manner, and Graham Wallas, Walter Lippmann, and others who

continued with searching studies of the group mind, established that the

group has mental characteristics distinct from those of the individual,

and is motivated by impulses and emotions which cannot be explained on

the basis of what we know of individual psychology. So the question

naturally arose. If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group

mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to

our will without their knowing about it? If you can influence the

leaders, either with or without their conscious cooperation, you

automatically influence the group which they sway. But men do not need

to be actually gathered together in a public meeting or in a street

riot, to be subject to the influences of mass psychology. Because man is

by nature gregarious he feels himself to be member of a herd, even when

he is alone in his room with the curtains drawn. His mind retains the

patterns which have been stamped on it by the group influences. Trotter

and Le Bon concluded that the group mind does not think in the strict

send of the word. In place of thoughts it has impulses, habits, and

emotions. In making up its mind, its first impulse is usually to follow

the example of a trusted leader. This is one of the most firmly

established principles of mass psychology. It operates in establishing

the rising or diminishing prestige of But when the example of the

leader is not at hand and the herd must think for itself, it does so by

means of clichés, pat words or images which stand for a whole group

of ideas or experiences. Not many years ago, it was only necessary to

tag a political candidate with the word interests to stampede millions

of people into voting against him, because anything associated with "the

interests" seemed necessary corrupt. Recently the word Bolshevik has

performed a similar service for persons who wished to frighten the

public away from a line of action. By playing upon a old cliché, or

manipulating a new one, the propagandist can sometimes swing a whole

mass group emotions. It is chiefly the psychologists of the school of

Freud( who have pointed out that many of man's thoughts and actions are

compensatory substitutes for desires which has been obliged to suppress.

A thing may be desired not for its intrinsic worth or usefulness, but

because he has unconsciously come to see in it a symbol of something

else, the desire for which he is ashamed to admit to himself. A man

buying a car may think he wants it for purposes of locomotion, whereas

the fact may be that he would really prefer not to be burdened with it,

and would rather walk for the sake of his health. He may really want it

because it is a symbol of social position, an evidence of his success in

business, or a means of pleasing his wife. This general principle, that

men are very largely actuated by motives which they conceal from

themselves, is as true of mass as of individual psychology. It is

evident that the successful propagandist must understand the true

motives and not be content to accept the reasons which men give for what

they do. Human desires are the steam which makes the social machine

work. Only by understanding them can the propagandist control that vast,

loose-jointed mechanism which is modern society. ... while, under the

handicraft of small-unit system of production was that typical a century

ago, demand created the supply, today supply must actively seek to

create its corresponding demand. A single factory, potentially capable

of supplying a whole continent with its particular product, cannot

afford to wait until the public asks for its product; it must maintain

constant touch, through advertising and propaganda, with the vast public

in order to assure itself the continuous demand which alone will make

its costly plant profitable. This entails a vastly more complex system

of distribution than formerly. No serious sociologist any longer

believes that the voice of the people expresses any divine or specially

wise and lofty idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of 3 the

people, and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders in whom it

believes and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public

opinion. It is composed of inherited prejudices and symbols and

clichés and verbal formulas supplied to them by the leaders.

Fortunately, the sincere and gifted politician is able, by the

instrument of propaganda, to mold and form the will of the people. The

political apathy of the average voter, of which we hear so much, is

undoubtedly due to the fact that the politician does not know how to

meet the conditions of the public mind. He cannot dramatize himself and

his platform in terms which have real meaning to the public. Acting on

the fallacy that the leader must slavishly follow, he deprives his

campaign of all dramatic interest. An automaton cannot arouse the public

interest. A leader, a fighter, a dictator, can. But, given our present

political conditions under which every office seeker must cater to the

vote of the masses, the only means by which the born leader can lead is

the expert use of propaganda. Whether in the problem of getting elected

to office or in the problem of interpreting and popularizing new issues,

or in the problem of making the day-to-day administration of public

affairs a vital part of the community life, the use of propaganda,

carefully adjusted to the mentality of the masses, is an essential

adjunct of political life. It is not necessary for the politician to be

the slave to the public's group prejudices, if he can learn how to mold

the mind of the voters in conformity with his own ideas of public

welfare and public service. The important thing for the statesman of our

age is not so much to know how to please the public, but know how to

sway the public. Good government can be sold to a community just as any

other commodity can be sold. One reason, perhaps, why the politician

today is slow to take up methods which are a commonplace in business

life is that he has such ready entry to the media of communication on

which his power depends. The newspaperman looks to him for news. And by

his power of giving or withholding information the politician can often

effectively censor political news. But being dependent, every day of the

year and for year after year, upon certain politicians for news, the

newspaper reporters are obliged to work in harmony with their news

sources. Propaganda is of no use to the politician unless he has

something to say which the public, consciously or unconsciously, wants

to hear. The criticism is often made that propaganda tends make the

President of the United States so important that he becomes not the

President but the embodiment of the idea of hero worship, not to say

deity worship. I quite agree that this is so, but how are you going to

stop a condition which accurately reflects the desires of a certain part

of the public? The American people rightly senses the enormous

importance of the executive's office. If the public tends to make of the

President a heroic symbol of that power, that is not the fault of

propaganda but lies in the very nature of the office and its relation to

the people. this is in or around TIJUANA hOBO rABBI no I believe in

one God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, all things

visible and invisible; And one Lord Jesus Christ,only Son of God,

begotten of his Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light,

being one with the Father; by whom all things were made; who for our

salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of

the Virgin Mary,and was made man; was crucified also under Pontius

Pilate; he suffered and was buried; and the third day he rose again

according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on

the right hand of the Father; he shall come again,to judge both the

quick and the dead; whose damnation shall have no end. I believe in the

Holy Ghost; who proceedeth from the Father; who with the Father and the

Son is worshipped and glorified; who spake by the Prophets. And I

believe one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church; I acknowledge one

baptism for the remission of sins; the resurrection of the dead, and

life of the world to come. AMEN.






Reply

^

Labels: PAUL spoke WITH THE WORDS of CHRIST.

- posted by boxcarro @ 5:59 AM